"Mr./Madam President, our final two briefings concern the wider world and the home front. Let's begin with the so-called 'Global South.' To put it bluntly, our current approach to Africa, Latin America, and much of Southeast Asia is a slow-motion strategic disaster. We are not just losing the competition for influence in these regions; we are losing it by default, through our own neglect, arrogance, and a profound failure to understand the new landscape.
Our analysis shows that Russia and China have brilliantly and successfully positioned the West, and particularly the United States, as an arrogant, hypocritical, and fundamentally unreliable former colonial power. They are not winning hearts and minds, because they are not trying to. They are exploiting a legitimate and deep-seated grievance. To a struggling leader in the Sahel, Russia does not offer lectures on human rights or a multi-year development plan from the World Bank. They offer a planeload of mercenaries, a briefcase of cash for the ruling elite, and a sophisticated disinformation package that blames all the country's problems on its former French colonizers. To a government in Latin America, China does not demand democratic reforms. It offers a massive, no-questions-asked infrastructure loan to build a port or a dam, a deal that is often accompanied by a quiet side-payment and a new Huawei telecommunications network that gives Beijing a permanent backdoor into the country's secrets.
Against this swift, cynical, and transactional model, we have been offering a response that is slow, bureaucratic, condescending, and, frankly, insulting. We offer small-scale aid packages with a mountain of paperwork. We offer sanctimonious lectures on democracy. But we do not show up with the speed, the scale, or the respect that these nations crave. Our failure to match our democratic rhetoric with real resources and a genuine partnership-based approach is creating a vast new sphere of authoritarian influence, not because their model is better, but because ours is so often absent. We are being out-maneuvered, out-spent, and out-hustled across half the world, not because we are weak, but because we have not been taking the game seriously."
"Mr./Madam President, winning back the trust and alignment of the Global South is not a matter of charity; it is a core national security imperative. The Action Plan to achieve this is not about more aid; it is about a fundamental change in our entire strategic posture and offer.
Action Item 1: From "Aid" to "Co-Investment" – A Real Alternative to the Belt and Road. The era of paternalistic, Western-led "development aid" is over. It is seen as slow, condescending, and ineffective. We will replace it with a new model of strategic co-investment. The "Economic NATO" will launch a new, multi-trillion dollar "Global Partnership for Infrastructure and Investment," a real, fully-funded, and transparent alternative to China's Belt and Road initiative. Our offer will be fundamentally better and more attractive. We will build high-quality, sustainable infrastructure that won't crumble in ten years. We will respect local labor and environmental laws. We will offer transparent lending terms that do not result in debt-trap diplomacy. Most importantly, we will co-invest as true partners, giving host nations a real stake and say in the projects. Our message will be simple: China offers debt and dependency; we offer partnership and prosperity.
Action Item 2: Counter the Mercenaries, Support Professionalism. We will aggressively counter Russia's mercenary-based security model in Africa. The Wagner Group/Africa Corps model is a cancer, offering short-term regime security in exchange for long-term state failure and the looting of natural resources. We will offer a superior alternative. We will dramatically expand our security, intelligence, and professional training packages to legitimate African governments and regional security blocs like ECOWAS. We will treat them as the primary security actors, providing them with the real-time intelligence, the logistical support, and the training they need to defeat their own internal security threats, making the Russian mercenary model obsolete and unnecessary. We must make it clear, with deeds, not just words, that partnership with Russia brings chaos and exploitation, while partnership with the democratic world brings stability and professionalism.
Action Aitem 3: Empower, Don't Preach. For too long, our "democracy promotion" has consisted of lecturing other nations about our values. This has failed. The new strategy should be to empower them to build their own resilient societies from the ground up. We will fully fund and operationalize the "Democratic Media Alliance." Our goal is not to fund a new Voice of America, but to provide grants, legal protection, and a global platform for independent, local journalists in these countries to do their own vital work of holding their own governments accountable. We will fully fund the "University of Democracy," not to teach them to be like us, but to give their next generation of leaders the practical, technical skills in law, administration, and finance that are the universal building blocks of any successful, transparent state, regardless of its cultural context.
Action Item 4: Solve Real Problems. Finally, we must demonstrate that a partnership with the democratic world delivers tangible, life-improving benefits to their people, not just their elites. We will make our vast technological and scientific resources available to solve real-world problems. This means co-investing in vaccine manufacturing hubs in Africa to prevent a repeat of the COVID-19 pandemic. It means exporting agricultural technology and clean-water systems. By focusing on these fundamental human security issues, we demonstrate our value and build a deep reservoir of goodwill that no authoritarian propaganda can easily erase."