www-us.org

Chapter 35: Iran II: The Syrian Forge: Perfecting the Axis

The operations room near Homs was a fusion of necessity. A Russian forward air controller, a secular soldier of the state, pointed at a satellite image on his screen, highlighting a fortified rebel position. Through a weary translator, he spoke to his counterpart, an Iranian Quds Force officer, a true believer in a revolutionary crusade. The Russian saw a tactical problem to be eliminated with airpower; the Iranian saw a nest of Sunni heretics to be purged by his ground troops.

The negotiation was tense but brief. A brutal synergy was agreed upon. The Iranian officer nodded to his own subordinate, a hardened field commander from Lebanese Hezbollah. The plan was set. The Russian jets would act as the hammer, pulverizing the main defenses and sowing terror. Then, Iran's proxies, the Hezbollah shock troops, would serve as the scalpel, moving in to clear the rubble of what remained. It was a partnership of predator and scavenger, a model of asymmetric warfare built not on friendship, but on a grimly shared objective. In the blood-soaked earth of Syria, the Axis of Resentment was being forged in fire.

The Discourse 35: A Transactional Axis on the Battlefield

35.1 A Partnership of Necessity
The Russo-Iranian military axis was not born of friendship, but forged out of a shared, desperate necessity in the Syrian Civil War. By 2015, their mutual client, the Assad regime, was on the brink of collapse. Russia, in a bid to save its only military foothold in the Middle East and reassert itself as a great power, possessed the advanced airpower that could change the war, but had no appetite for a costly ground invasion. Iran, seeking to preserve the critical linchpin of its "Shia Crescent" land bridge from Tehran to Beirut, had a network of loyal, battle-hardened ground proxies, but lacked the airpower to protect them. The result was one of the most effective, if unlikely, military partnerships of the 21st century. See citation[1].

35.2 The Division of Labor: Russia's Air Force, Iran's Infantry
The alliance operated on a clear and brutally efficient division of labor. Russia provided the high-tech, capital-intensive assets:

• Air Supremacy: Advanced fighter jets to conduct precision airstrikes.

• Intelligence & Targeting: Satellite imagery, signals intelligence, and Special Forces (Spetsnaz) to identify and designate targets.

• A Diplomatic Shield: The crucial veto power at the UN Security Council, protecting the joint operation from international condemnation or intervention.

Iran, in turn, provided the indispensable, ideologically motivated, and expendable "boots on the ground":

• The Ground Force Multiplier: This included thousands of its own IRGC troops and, more importantly, its vast network of proxies who did the bulk of the difficult urban fighting. This network featured elite units from Lebanese Hezbollah, various Iraqi Shia militias, and even mercenaries recruited from among Afghan refugees (the Fatemiyoun Division). See citation[2].

35.3 Securing Shared Strategic Victories
The joint intervention was an undeniable success for both powers. Together, they saved the Assad regime from certain defeat. For Russia, it secured its strategic goals: the expansion of its naval base at Tartus and the establishment of the Khmeimim airbase. For Iran, it was an even greater victory, as it secured its critical "land bridge" connecting Tehran, through Iraq and Syria, to its Hezbollah clients in Lebanon, cementing its status as the dominant regional power. See citation[3].

35.4 From Syria to Ukraine: The Payback
The partnership forged in Syria did not end there; it evolved into a full-blown strategic axis. Having provided the crucial ground forces in Syria, Iran was in a position to demand a "payback" when Russia's own army became bogged down in Ukraine. The thousands of Shahed drones that Iran has supplied to Russia are a direct consequence of this partnership. In return, as will be detailed in the next chapter, Russia has begun paying the ultimate price: delivering its own advanced military technology to Tehran, transforming a transactional partnership in Syria into a global threat. See citation[4].

References

1. Balanche, Fabrice. "The Division of Labor in the Pro-Assad Coalition." The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Policywatch 2933, February 16, 2018. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/division-labor-pro-assad-coalition

2. Solomon, Erika, and Mahmoud S. El-Wardany. "How the War in Ukraine Is Helping Iran Project Power in Syria." Bloomberg, May 3, 2023. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-03/how-the-war-in-ukraine-is-helping-iran-project-power-in-syria

3. United States Institute of Peace. "Iran's 'Land Bridge' to the Mediterranean." Special Report, July 24, 2018. https://www.usip.org/publications/2018/07/irans-land-bridge-mediterranean

4. Dagres, Holly, and Graham T. Allison. "The Iran-Russia Alliance Gets a Significant Upgrade." The Atlantic, October 26, 2022. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2022/10/iran-russia-su-35-fighter-jets-ukraine-drones/671853/