www-us.org

Chapter 59: A Society Built for Humans

The "Lost Boys" speech had sent a tremor through the national conversation, a deeply uncomfortable diagnosis of a sickness many felt but few could name. The address was praised for its courage, but it was also dark, a grim accounting of a nation’s failings. At his next public discussion, a teacher from a local high school asked the inevitable, necessary question.

“Mr. Corbin,” she said, her voice filled with a mixture of weariness and hope. “You have given us a powerful diagnosis of the crisis facing our young men, and our society. But a diagnosis is not a cure. What, in your view, does a healthy and successful society actually look like?”

Julian stood in the center of the stage, the question hanging in the quiet auditorium. He nodded, acknowledging its weight.

“That is the right question,” he began. “And to answer it, I think we first need to be clear about what a successful society is not. For decades, we have been told to look at certain hyper-competitive Asian countries as the model for the future. We are told to admire their test scores, their economic growth, their relentless work ethic. And we should. But we must also have the courage to see the profound human cost of that model.”

“A society that prioritizes narrow, measurable achievement—the test score, the quarterly report—above all else, risks creating a generation of citizens who are like perfect, interchangeable cogs in a machine,” he said. “They can be highly productive, highly efficient, but they are often unhappy, uncreative, and lacking a broader sense of a meaningful life. That is not my vision for America. A nation’s greatness is not measured by its GDP alone. It is measured by the quality of the lives its citizens are able to live.”

He then presented his positive vision. “The goal of a great society, the ultimate goal of the MARG platform, is not just to create a more efficient machine. It is to create the conditions for the flourishing of all-rounded people.”

He defined the term. “An all-rounded person is not just an economic unit. They are not just a worker. They are a citizen who is socially connected to their community. They are a person who is physically and mentally healthy. They are a family member who has the time and the emotional capacity to be present for the people they love. And they are an individual who is capable of enjoying a rich, meaningful, and joyful private life. That is the goal. A society built for humans, not for cogs.”

He could feel the abstract, philosophical nature of the argument beginning to lose the audience. He needed to make it concrete. He needed a simple, powerful, and deeply human metric.

“Let me offer you a simple test,” he said, his voice becoming softer, more intimate. “A single, simple measure of whether we are a successful society. A society is successful when its children can safely walk or bike to school.”

A quiet murmur went through the room as people processed the simple, startling power of the image.

He explained the systemic implications. “Think about what is required for that simple act to be possible. It requires, first, a society with a high degree of public safety, where parents are not terrified of crime. It requires, second, an investment in human-scale infrastructure: clean, well-maintained sidewalks, safe crosswalks, dedicated bike paths.”

“But most importantly,” he continued, “it requires a high degree of social trust. It requires neighbors who know each other, who look out for each other’s children. It requires a community. And it requires a collective commitment. Because this is a problem that cannot be solved on an individual level. If only one family in a neighborhood lets their children walk to school, those children become a target. They are an anomaly. They are unsafe. But if a hundred families in a neighborhood make the same choice, if the streets are filled with groups of children walking and biking together, they create a system of collective safety. They become the norm. Safety is a network effect.”

He looked out at the audience, at the faces of the parents, the teachers, the citizens.

“That is the society we must build,” he concluded. “A society where we have rebuilt the social trust, where we have invested in our communities, and where we have made our streets safe enough for our own children to walk upon. If we can achieve that one, simple, human-scale goal, I promise you, almost all of our other, larger problems will have already begun to solve themselves.”

The Discourse, 59; The KPI of a Healthy Society

Section 59.1: The Critique of the "Over-Socialized" Model

Julian Corbin's opening critique of certain hyper-competitive Asian societies as producing "cogs in a machine" is a sophisticated argument against what some sociologists, following the work of Max Weber, might call a perfectly "rationalized" but "over-socialized" society. In this model, the individual is subsumed by the needs of the collective—whether the corporation or the state. The educational and social systems are optimized for a single output: creating a highly efficient and productive economic unit.

Corbin's argument is that this model, while potentially successful in maximizing certain metrics like GDP or test scores, comes at a profound human cost. It suppresses individualism, creativity, and the development of a rich private life, leading to what he sees as a less desirable, less humane form of existence. This is a philosophical stance, a rejection of pure utilitarianism in favor of a more holistic, humanistic definition of a successful society.

Section 59.2: The "All-Rounded Person" as a Social Ideal

Corbin’s positive vision is centered on the ideal of the "all-rounded person." This is a concept with deep roots in Western philosophy, from the Greek ideal of the balanced citizen to the Renaissance ideal of the "Renaissance Man." It is a vision of human flourishing that is multi-dimensional.

He is arguing that the purpose of a political and economic system should not be merely to maximize wealth. Its purpose should be to create the conditions under which its citizens can develop themselves fully—intellectually, socially, physically, and emotionally. This is a direct challenge to a purely economic model of human motivation. It suggests that a good society must value leisure, community, family, and private life as highly as it values work and productivity.

Section 59.3: The "Walk to School" Test as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI)

The most powerful element of the speech is the introduction of the "Walk to School" test. This is a brilliant piece of political communication. It takes the abstract, philosophical ideal of a "healthy society" and translates it into a single, concrete, measurable, and emotionally resonant Key Performance Indicator (KPI).

As a KPI, it is incredibly effective because it is a "leading indicator" of numerous other, deeper social realities. For children to be able to walk to school, a whole host of other conditions must be met:

• Low Crime Rates: A measure of public safety and effective governance.

• High Social Trust: A measure of community cohesion, what sociologist Robert Putnam termed "social capital." Neighbors must trust each other to look out for the community's children.

• Human-Scale Infrastructure: A measure of a society's investment in its local communities over massive, impersonal projects.

• Public Health: A measure of a culture that values physical activity and rejects a sedentary lifestyle.

Section 59.4: The "Safety in Numbers" Principle as a Collective Action Problem

Corbin's final point—that one family walking is a risk, but a hundred families walking creates safety—is a simple, intuitive explanation of a complex concept from game theory: the collective action problem. Many desirable social goods (like a safe, walkable community) cannot be achieved by individual action alone. If only one person acts, they bear all the risk and reap little reward. But if a critical mass of people act together, the risk is distributed and minimized, and the reward is enjoyed by all.

This is a subtle but profound argument against a purely individualistic, libertarian worldview. Corbin is making the case that a good life requires not just individual freedom, but a strong, healthy, and cooperative community. He is arguing for a new social compact, a collective commitment to rebuilding the local, human-scale systems that make a good and safe life possible.