Hakan, the sharp, impeccably dressed Deputy Director of the Eurasia Desk, worked from a soundproofed, minimalist office in Ankara's sprawling, thousand-room presidential palace. From his high window, on a clear day, he could see the distant, silver-blue ribbon of the Bosphorus Strait itself, the endless, silent procession of tankers and grain ships passing through that vital global artery. He saw that waterway not as a body of water, but as the ultimate geopolitical chokepoint, a gift from God and history. His President, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, was the man whose hand was on the tap. Hakan's job was to monetize that control, and his life was a masterclass in perpetual, managed schizophrenia.
His mornings, without fail, belonged to Kyiv. At precisely 9 a.m., he took an urgent, encrypted video call from his counterparts in Ukraine's military intelligence directorate, the GUR. He confirmed the overnight intelligence packet: high-resolution imagery and precise GPS coordinates for a Russian armored column spotted moving towards the front lines by a Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 drone, the same iconic weapon that had become a global symbol of Ukrainian resistance. The intelligence was a gift, a lifeline. An hour later, he drafted a stern, almost bellicose public statement for his minister to deliver at the upcoming NATO defense ministerial. He used the strongest possible language, condemning a recent Russian missile strike on a civilian shopping mall as "a barbaric war crime" and a "stain on our common humanity." The words were strong, the sentiment seemingly sincere. Every drone delivered, every statement issued, was another poker chip he could use in his afternoon negotiations with the West.
But after a simple lunch of bread and soup at his desk, his entire focus, and his entire loyalty, shifted 180 degrees to Moscow. He joined a closed-door meeting in a gilded, neo-Ottoman conference room with a visiting delegation from Russia's state-owned energy giant, Gazprom. They were discussing a new natural gas hub to be built in Thrace, a project that would re-route Russian gas away from the now-sabotaged Nord Stream pipelines and bring it through Turkey instead. Hakan saw the brilliant cynicism of it: the plan would allow Russia to continue its energy coercion of Europe, but with Turkey, a NATO member, now holding the tap. It was a move that would make Ankara both indispensable and unaccountable.
His final task for the day arrived in a thin, unmarked manila folder. It contained an application package. He opened it to see the schematics for a 140-meter superyacht, the Eclipse II, a vessel of breathtaking opulence. The owner was a newly sanctioned Russian oligarch, a childhood friend of Vladimir Putin. The application was for a long-term berth at a luxury marina in Bodrum, a sun-drenched, sanctions-free haven. Tucked behind the paperwork was the oligarch's application for Turkish citizenship-by-investment. Hakan placed his neat, untroubled signature on the forms.
As he did, his encrypted phone buzzed. It was the Ukrainian GUR again, thanking him for the drone intelligence and asking if Turkey would join the latest G7 sanctions package targeting the very oligarch whose new passport he now held in his hand. He typed a polite, non-committal reply and put the phone down.
Hakan saw no contradiction; he saw only leverage. To him, the Westerners with their talk of 'values' were naive. Power was the only value. Leverage was the only ally. Turks were survivors, brokers sitting on the world's most valuable real estate for a thousand years. His job was not to choose a side, but simply, as his ancestors had always done, to collect the toll. He was not a double agent serving two masters; he was a loyal servant of one master, President Erdoğan, who was expertly playing two servants, forcing both superpowers to bid for Turkey's favor. In the cynical calculus of the new multipolar world, this was not hypocrisy; it was genius.
78.1 The "Indispensable" Power: Turkey's Geopolitical Doctrine
As a long-standing and powerful NATO member, Turkey's response to the war in Ukraine is not one of simple neutrality, but a complex, audacious, and often contradictory balancing act that has made it one of the most pivotal and controversial actors in the entire conflict. Under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey has pursued a distinct doctrine of "strategic ambiguity," a highly transactional and nationalist foreign policy designed to make itself indispensable to all sides of the conflict simultaneously. See [citation 1]. This has allowed it to provide tangible military and diplomatic support to Ukraine while concurrently acting as Russia's most critical economic and financial lifeline to the global economy. This "double game" is a deliberate strategic choice, made possible by its unique and powerful geopolitical position controlling the vital Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits, the only maritime passage between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. See [citation 2].
78.2 The Pro-Ukraine Ledger: A Record of Consequential Support
Turkey's contributions to Ukraine's defense have been significant, tangible, and at times, strategically decisive. While its Western partners have often dithered, Ankara has taken several key actions that have fundamentally altered the course of the war:
Military Support: In the crucial opening weeks of the conflict, Turkey's public sale of the highly effective Bayraktar TB2 armed drones was a critical factor in Ukraine's ability to blunt Russia's massive armored assault on Kyiv. The drones became a symbol of Ukrainian resistance at a moment when the world expected Kyiv to fall.
Control of the Straits: Invoking the 1936 Montreux Convention in the first days of the war, Turkey formally closed the Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits to the passage of any new military warships. This single act trapped the bulk of Russia's aging Black Sea Fleet, likely preventing the deployment of up to a dozen modern, Kalibr-capable Russian warships from other fleets, a decision which has been instrumental in enabling Ukraine's campaign to win the battle of the Black Sea. See [citation 2].
Diplomatic Brokerage: President Erdoğan skillfully positioned himself as the primary mediator, hosting early peace talks and, most notably, helping to broker the UN-backed Black Sea Grain Initiative, a deal that, while humanitarian in effect, also served Turkey's interests by stabilizing global food prices and enhancing its own diplomatic prestige.
78.3 The Pro-Russia Ledger: An Economic Lifeline
Simultaneously, Turkey has deliberately transformed itself into Russia's single most important gateway to the global economy. This role has demonstrably and quantifiably helped the Kremlin to withstand the impact of Western sanctions, thereby prolonging the very war Turkey claims to be trying to end.
Refusal to Sanction: Despite being a NATO member, Turkey has conspicuously refused to join the comprehensive US and EU sanctions regimes, creating a massive legal and financial loophole on the alliance's southern flank.
Economic and Financial Hub: By the end of 2023, bilateral trade between Turkey and Russia had surged to over $60 billion, more than double its pre-war level. Its ports became notorious safe havens for the superyachts of sanctioned Russian oligarchs, while its citizenship-by-investment programs offered them a new nationality. See [citation 3].
Energy Partnership: While Europe underwent a painful de-coupling from Russian energy, Turkey has deliberately deepened its energy interdependence, successfully negotiating significant discounts on Russian oil and natural gas and aggressively moving forward with a Putin-blessed plan to create a Russian gas "hub" in the Turkish region of Thrace.
78.4 An Alliance of "Civilization-State" Autocrats
This audacious balancing act is rooted in a shared, personalist worldview between the two leaders. Both Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Vladimir Putin see themselves not as conventional presidents, but as historical figures destined to restore the lost glory of their respective "civilization-states"—Ottoman and Russian. They both lead highly personalized regimes, chafe under the constraints of international law, and believe that politics is ultimately a zero-sum contest of national will. This allows them to make direct, top-down deals that bypass institutional oversight. See [citation 4]. By masterfully playing his role as the indispensable broker, Erdoğan has managed to extract concessions from both sides, boost his own domestic and regional prestige, and carve out a unique, powerful, and deeply problematic position as NATO's in-house adversary. While this has been successful in the short term, it creates an "indispensability trap," leaving Turkey's economy dangerously entangled with a volatile and declining Russia.