In the grim, anxious spring of 2022, French President Emmanuel Macron cut a solitary figure on the world stage. To the global television audience, he was the persistent, almost desperate face of diplomacy. While London and Washington spoke of anti-tank missiles and crushing sanctions, the French leader remained glued to his secure telephone line in the Élysée Palace, logging over one hundred hours of conversation with Vladimir Putin. He famously sat at the impossibly long, white lacquer table in the Kremlin, physically isolated but intellectually convinced that he could bridge the gap. He spoke of "security guarantees" for Moscow and warned against the historical danger of "humiliating" Russia.
To his critics in Warsaw and Kyiv, Macron was a naïve appeaser, a man clinging to the delusions of a bygone era of European gentility. To his supporters, he was the last rational statesman trying to prevent a continental suicide.
But the transformation, when it arrived, was violent and total. By early 2024, the Dove of the Élysée had become the fiercest Hawk in NATO. It was Macron who shattered the ultimate Western taboo, standing before microphones to declare that sending Western ground troops to Ukraine "could not be ruled out," a statement that sent shockwaves through Washington and Berlin.
This radical metamorphosis did not occur because of a persuasive briefing in Brussels or a battlefield update from the Donbas. It happened because the French Republic was violently mugged, not in Eastern Europe, but four thousand kilometers to the south, in the searing, red-dust expanses of the Sahel.
While Macron had been guarding the front door of Europe in Ukraine, Russia had been picking the lock of the back door in Africa.
The theater of this humiliation was Françafrique, the vast post-colonial sphere of influence in West Africa that had underpinned French global power for sixty years. For decades, the arrangement had been paternalistic, messy, but fundamentally stable: France provided military security against jihadist insurgents through Operation Barkhane; in return, the former colonies provided political loyalty and, crucially, exclusive access to the raw materials that powered the French economy.
But beginning in 2021, French intelligence agents from the DGSE began intercepting a disturbing new pattern of flight manifests. Heavy Ilyushin-76 transport planes, painted in nondescript grey and lacking official registration markings, were touching down on pot-holed airstrips in Bamako, Mali. Stepping onto the tarmac were not diplomats, but hard-faced men in unbadged desert fatigues, bearing the equipment of the newly rebranded "Africa Corps."
These were the successors to the Wagner Group, fully nationalized under the Russian Ministry of Defense following the death of Yevgeny Prigozhin. They arrived in the capitals of West Africa with a sales pitch that was devastating in its cynical simplicity.
To the fragile, coup-prone juntas ruling these nations, the West offered development aid tied to tedious, hectoring conditions. The French demanded timelines for elections, transparency reports, and human rights tribunals. Russia offered something else: a "Regime Survival Package."
We will be your Praetorian Guard, the Russian envoys promised the colonels in Mali and Burkina Faso. We will protect you from your own military rivals. We will crush the protesters in the streets. We ask no questions about torture, suspended constitutions, or cancelled elections. In exchange, you simply kick out the French. And you give us the keys to the mines.
The collapse of French power was a masterful, slow-motion demolition. First Mali fell, the junta expelling the French ambassador and inviting in the Russians. Then Burkina Faso followed suit. French flags were burned in the streets of Ouagadougou by "spontaneous" crowds chanting Putin’s name—crowds organized on WhatsApp and Telegram by Russian "political technologists" operating out of St. Petersburg troll farms.
But the true strategic catastrophe occurred in Niger in July 2023. This was not just a blow to French prestige; it was a knife to the throat of the French economy. For fifty years, the French state-owned nuclear giant, Orano (formerly Areva), had relied on the vast open-pit mines of Arlit and the massive deposits at Imouraren to source the uranium that fueled the fifty-six nuclear reactors providing 70% of France’s electricity. Niger was the lightbulb of Paris.
When the pro-Western President Mohamed Bazoum was toppled by General Tchiani—a man groomed by Moscow’s anti-colonial rhetoric—the trap snapped shut. The new junta threatened to revoke Orano’s operating permits. The 1,500 French soldiers stationed in the country—the last bastion of Western counter-terrorism in the region—were humiliatingly ordered to leave. As the last French transport plane lifted off from Niamey, Russian technicians moved in to survey the yellowcake assets.
Back in Paris, Macron watched the intelligence feeds with a cold, crystallizing fury. He finally saw the map as Putin saw it. The war in Ukraine and the coups in Africa were not separate events; they were two fronts of a single, total war.
Russia was not just fighting for territory in the Donbas. It was using the Sahel to choke Europe’s energy supply by seizing the uranium. It was seizing the gold mines of Mali to launder money and bypass Western sanctions. And, most sinisterly of all, the Russian mercenaries were deliberately brutalizing local populations to act as a "migration pump." By destabilizing the region and fueling insurgency, Russia was engineering a massive wave of desperate refugees that would wash up on the shores of the Mediterranean, fueling the rise of anti-European far-right parties in Paris and Rome—political forces that were, conveniently, sympathetic to Moscow.
The days of the long table were over. Macron realized that there could be no "security guarantees" for a mafia state that was actively dismantling the French presence in the Global South. He understood that he could not save French influence in the Sahel by fighting in the desert, where he would be branded a neo-colonist aggressor. To stop the bleeding in Africa, he had to break the back of the Russian state in Ukraine. The hawk of the Élysée had not been born of ambition; it had been born of vengeance.
81.1 The "Regime Survival" Franchise
Russia has successfully productized the concept of autocrat protection, offering a service that Western democracies legally, morally, and politically cannot match. The "Africa Corps"—the state-controlled successor to the Wagner Group, now integrated directly under the Russian Ministry of Defense—operates not as a traditional military ally, but as a specialized service provider for sovereign states. It markets a "Regime Survival Package" that solves the primary anxiety of the post-colonial African dictator: internal overthrow.
This package consists of a three-tier "autocracy stack." First is Kinetic Protection: hardened, Russian-speaking mercenaries act as the Praetorian Guard for the presidential palace, providing a firewall against local military coups. Second is Information Dominance: Russian "political technologists" deploy industrial-scale disinformation campaigns on platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Telegram, flooding the local information space with anti-colonial, anti-French narratives that manufacture consent for the junta. Third is Sanctions Evasion: the provision of illicit logistical and financial channels to move the regime's wealth into safe havens like Dubai, bypassing the inevitable Western sanctions. Unencumbered by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or human rights legislation, Moscow offers a relationship based on transactional brutality, creating a franchise model of authoritarianism that is spreading rapidly across the Sahel.
81.2 The Great Resource Swap: Uranium and Gold
The Russian pivot to Africa is not merely an exercise in prestige or "great power competition"; it is a critical, material component of the Russian war economy. The Kremlin charges for its security services in raw earth. In Mali, the strategic objective was gold. Russian forces and their junta allies forcibly seized control of the Intahaka gold mine, the largest artisanal site in the country’s north. This gold is not taxed; it is effectively looted or conceded, flown directly out of the country to neutral hubs in the Middle East. It serves as a vital source of unsanctionable liquidity, providing the Kremlin with hard assets that can be swapped for currency outside the SWIFT banking system to purchase dual-use technology.
In Niger, the stakes are even higher: uranium. By displacing France’s Orano from the yellowcake fields of Arlit, Russia aims to consolidate a stranglehold on the global nuclear fuel cycle. While Russia possesses vast domestic uranium reserves, controlling the high-grade African output denies it to Europe and allows Rosatom to exert significant pricing pressure on the global market. This is strategic asphyxiation: Russia is attempting to hold the European nuclear energy sector, which is desperately trying to decouple from Russian gas, hostage to Russian-controlled uranium.
81.3 The "Weaponized Migration" Engine
Perhaps the most damaging asymmetric weapon deployed in this theater is the instrumentalization of human misery. Russian strategists understand that the European Union’s greatest internal political vulnerability is illegal migration. A surge in refugee numbers fuels social division, strains budgets, and drives voters toward Euro-skeptic, far-right parties that are historically sympathetic to Moscow.
The expulsion of French stabilization forces (Operation Barkhane) and UN peacekeepers (MINUSMA) has created a deliberate security vacuum. Into this void steps the Africa Corps, whose counter-insurgency tactics often involve the indiscriminate brutalization of civilian populations—such as the documented massacre at Moura in Mali. These atrocities act as a powerful "push factor," uprooting tens of thousands of civilians who flee northwards through the desert. Russian military intelligence (GRU) networks in Libya then facilitate the smuggling routes that channel this flow toward the southern coast of Europe. This creates a strategic feedback loop: Russian violence creates African refugees; refugees destabilize French and Italian politics; a destabilized Europe struggles to maintain the consensus required to support Ukraine.
81.4 Revenge for "Françafrique"
President Emmanuel Macron’s dramatic hardening of rhetoric against Russia in 2024—specifically his refusal to rule out Western boots on the ground—is legally justified by the defense of Kyiv, but practically driven by the humiliation in the Sahel. The dismantling of "Françafrique" threatens France’s status as a global power; without its African sphere of influence, France risks being reduced to merely a European middle power. Macron recognized that playing the "good cop" diplomat in Europe while being aggressively evicted from his country’s historical backyard was a losing strategy. His hawkish turn represents a doctrine of horizontal escalation. Since France cannot fight Russia directly in the Sahel without triggering accusations of neocolonialism that would alienate the entire Global South, it must seek to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia in the primary theater of Ukraine. The defense of Kharkiv has thus become the forward defense of French global influence.