Omar was a volunteer for the Syrian Civil Defence—a White Helmet. His daily reality was a living nightmare, a routine of responding to a rain of Russian and Syrian bombs on the besieged eastern half of Aleppo. He arrived at the scene of an airstrike on a breadline. The carnage was overwhelming. He and his team worked frantically, their hands tearing at the rubble, pulling screaming survivors and the limp bodies of children from the wreckage.
Then, they heard it. The familiar, sickening roar of a jet returning. A second bomb slammed into the same location. It was the "double-tap," a tactic so cruel it felt like a personalized form of evil, designed specifically to kill the first responders, to murder the helpers. Omar was thrown by the blast, his world turning to smoke, dust, and the screams of his own wounded colleagues.
Later that week, recovering from his injuries, he was in the team's headquarters, located in the basement of a hospital for a measure of safety. He learned that the hospital's coordinates had been shared with the UN for deconfliction, a process that was supposed to place it on a "no-strike" list. It made no difference. The bunker-buster bomb that tore through the floors above them was terrifyingly precise. He realized with a chilling certainty that the civilian infrastructure of his city—the hospitals, the schools, the bakeries—was not collateral damage. It was the target. The strategy was not to defeat the rebels; it was to make the city so unlivable that its very existence would be a surrender.
23.1 A Blueprint for Terror
The siege of Aleppo was the crucible where the modern Russian-Syrian strategy for urban warfare was perfected. This set of tactics, which can be termed "The Aleppo Playbook," represents a deliberate doctrine of annihilation, where the primary objective is to make civilian life impossible in order to break a population's will to resist. This playbook, refined in Syria, was later deployed with horrifying familiarity in the sieges of Ukrainian cities like Mariupol and Bucha. Its core tactics are systematic and repeatable.
23.2 Tactic I: Siege and the Destruction of Civilian Infrastructure
The first step is total encirclement, cutting off all access to food, water, and medicine. This is followed by the systematic and deliberate targeting of what the Geneva Conventions define as "objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population." Russian and Syrian air forces conducted a coordinated campaign of targeting hospitals, bakeries, markets, and water-pumping stations. Specific tactics, like the "double-tap" airstrike—bombing a location once, and then again minutes later to kill the first responders—were employed to maximize terror and render humanitarian aid almost impossible. See citation[1]. The organization Physicians for Human Rights documented hundreds of attacks on medical facilities during the war, calling it a key feature of the regime's strategy. See citation[2].
23.3 Tactic II: Fake "Humanitarian Corridors" and Disinformation
The second step involves a psychological campaign to foster terror and distrust. The playbook includes the repeated announcement of "humanitarian corridors" for civilian evacuation, which are then shelled or mined, punishing those who try to flee. The UN Commission of Inquiry for Syria documented these acts, confirming that such corridors were often used as traps. See citation[3]. This physical violence is paired with a relentless disinformation campaign through state media, which labels every single person in an opposition-held area—including doctors, children, and rescue workers like the White Helmets—as a "terrorist," thereby justifying their slaughter to a domestic audience.
23.4 The Strategic Lesson: Victory Through Atrocity
The Aleppo Playbook proved to be a brutal but effective military strategy for Russia. It allowed its client, the Assad regime, to secure a total victory without the need for costly and difficult street-to-street urban combat. By simply annihilating the city from a distance, Russia achieved its military goals at a low cost in Russian blood. The lack of any meaningful international consequences for these documented war crimes taught the Kremlin a powerful and dangerous lesson: that victory could be achieved not just in spite of, but through, the commission of atrocities. It was a lesson that would be applied again, years later, on European soil. See citation[4].
Heller, Sam. "A rain of 'double-tap' strikes is haunting civilians - and the medics attempting to save them." The Daily Beast, October 21, 2016. https://www.thedailybeast.com/a-rain-of-bombs-of-double-tap-strikes-is-haunting-civiliansand-the-medics-attempting-to-save-them
Physicians for Human Rights. "Aleppo Abandoned: A Case Study on Health Care in Syria." Report, February 2017. https://phr.org/reports/aleppo-abandoned-a-case-study-on-health-care-in-syria/
United Nations. "Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic." A/HRC/34/64, 2 February 2017.
Kofman, Michael, and Matthew Rojansky. "What Kind of Victory for Russia in Syria?" Military Review, March-April 2018. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/March-April-2018/Kofman-Syria/