www-us.org

Thank you. I will honor that instruction.

Chapter 25: The Syrian Forge V: The Spoils of War: A Mediterranean Fortress and an Emboldened Kremlin

The final scene is not one of battle, but of quiet consolidation. We see the brand-new missile frigates of the Russian Navy docked at Tartus, no longer temporary guests, but permanent masters of a deep-water port on the Mediterranean. We cut to the UN Security Council chamber in New York. The Russian ambassador, without a hint of irony, raises his hand to veto a resolution condemning the use of barrel bombs against civilians, a weapon his own air force had just helped to deploy. The camera holds on his cynical, impassive face.

The final shot is in the Kremlin. Vladimir Putin is watching a news report about Western leaders wringing their hands over the humanitarian catastrophe in Aleppo. There is no triumphant smile on his face, only the cold, confident, and deeply satisfied expression of a man who has just run a highly successful experiment. He had leveled a city, broken every rule of war, tested his new weapons, cemented his power, and established a strategic fortress on Europe's southern doorstep. The world had complained, but it had done nothing. The price of victory through atrocity, he had learned, was zero. The lesson was learned. The path to Kyiv had been cleared.

The Discourse 25: A Green Light for Aggression

25.1 The Tangible Spoils of War
The Russian intervention in Syria was an unequivocal strategic success that yielded significant, tangible rewards, fundamentally altering the geopolitical balance in the region. The primary spoils were military. Russia secured formal, long-term agreements with the Assad regime granting it control over the Tartus naval base and the Khmeimim airbase for at least 49 years. [CITATION 1] These were not minor outposts; they were transformed into permanent fortresses, allowing the Russian military to project power across the Middle East, into North Africa, and into the Eastern Mediterranean, directly challenging NATO's southern flank.

25.2 The Intangible Spoils: A Live-Fire Sales Demonstration
Beyond the bases, the war served as a brutally effective live-fire sales demonstration for the Russian military-industrial complex. New weapon systems, from Kalibr cruise missiles launched from the Caspian Sea to advanced electronic warfare suites, were tested and showcased in a real-world combat environment. As analysts from the Royal United Services Institute have noted, this allowed Russia not only to provide "proof of concept" for its modernized military but also to market its hardware to international buyers, seeking to compete with Western arms suppliers. [CITATION 2]

25.3 Russia as the Indispensable Power
Diplomatically, the intervention achieved Putin's long-held goal of re-establishing Russia as an indispensable global power. By decisively intervening where the West would not, Putin became the central actor in the Syrian conflict, a man who had to be courted by all regional powers, including Turkey, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. He had proven that Russia was a more reliable—and more ruthless—ally to its clients than the United States was to its own partners. [CITATION 3]

25.4 The Green Light: The Moral Hazard of Impunity
The most important and catastrophic outcome of the Syrian intervention was the lesson it taught the Kremlin. The West's complete failure to impose any meaningful, long-term consequences—military, economic, or diplomatic—on Russia for its documented war crimes and its blatant violation of state sovereignty was interpreted in Moscow as a clear sign of weakness, division, and a profound lack of resolve. This created a massive "moral hazard." By demonstrating that the price for waging a war of annihilation on behalf of a client state was effectively zero, the West gave Russia a clear and unambiguous green light to contemplate future, more ambitious acts of aggression. The impunity granted in Aleppo was the down payment on the invasion of Ukraine. [CITATION 4]

References

1. Cohen, Roger, and Paul Sonne. "Russia Is Entrenching Itself in Syria. What's Its Endgame?" The New York Times, March 14, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/14/world/middleeast/russia-syria-putin.html

2. Cranny-Briggs, K. "Guns for Show: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Russian Military Technology in Syria." Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), Occasional Paper, February 2020.

3. Trenin, Dmitri. "Russia in the Middle East: Moscow's Objectives, Priorities, and Policy Drivers." Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, April 2016. https://carnegieendowment.org/2016/04/05/russia-in-middle-east-moscow-s-objectives-priorities-and-policy-drivers-pub-63244

4. Rojansky, Matthew, and Michael Kofman. "What Kind of Victory for Russia in Syria?" Military Review, March-April 2018. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/March-April-2018/Kofman-Syria/