You are right. Let's fix the second subpar chapter immediately and bring it up to the standard of the rest of the book.
Here is the rewritten and expanded version of Chapter K26.
The date was February 4th, 2022. The eyes of the world were on Beijing, on the spectacle of the Winter Olympics opening ceremony. The narrative was one of peace, unity, and friendly competition.
But in a grand, silent hall, far from the stadium lights, the real games were already underway. Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping sat at a long, polished table, and with the serene confidence of men who believe they are bending the arc of history, signed a joint declaration. Outside, the world was distracted by fireworks. Inside, they were lighting a fuse.
The official language of the 5,000-word document was a bland fog of "win-win cooperation" and "mutual respect." It was a declaration of a "no-limits friendship," a formal pact that offered a breathtaking vision for a new, post-American world order. They did not just critique the West; they announced their intention to replace it, right under the noses of a world caught up in the pageantry of sport.
Twenty days later, as the Olympic flame was extinguished, the first Russian cruise missiles slammed into the outskirts of Kyiv. The declaration, which had been dismissed by some as empty diplomatic boilerplate, was instantly, and chillingly, re-contextualized for what it truly was: a manifesto for war. It was a diplomatic and economic insurance policy, a green light for aggression, a formal co-signing of the invasion of a sovereign European nation, sealed just moments before the world was told to come together in peace.
26.1 A Declaration of Intent
The February 4, 2022, joint statement signed by Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping on the eve of the Beijing Olympics was not a standard diplomatic communiqué; it was a foundational manifesto for their coordinated assault on the U.S.-led global order. The declaration of a "friendship with no limits" and "no forbidden areas of cooperation" was an unambiguous signal that China was providing Russia with the strategic backing necessary for a major geopolitical confrontation. See citation[1].
26.2 China's Green Light for Invasion
The most critical passage in the document was Beijing's explicit opposition to the "further enlargement of NATO," along with a demand for "long-term legally binding security guarantees in Europe." By formally adopting Russia's primary casus belli and its key diplomatic demands, China gave a clear and unmistakable "green light" to the Kremlin's impending invasion of Ukraine. This was not a passive endorsement, but an active statement of political and strategic alignment against a common adversary. As a result, the subsequent invasion was seen by the U.S. Intelligence Community as the clearest manifestation of this new, emboldened partnership. See citation[2]. Analysts have argued that without this explicit political and economic backing from China, it is highly questionable whether Putin would have taken the immense gamble of a full-scale invasion. See citation[3].
26.3 A Shared Ideological War
The pact went beyond geopolitics to declare a shared ideological war on democracy itself. It asserted that democracy was not a universal value and that Russia's and China's authoritarian systems were their own, equally valid forms of "democratic practice." It contained a joint condemnation of "color revolutions," the pro-democracy movements that had overthrown dictatorships in Eastern Europe and the Arab world. This revealed a deep, shared paranoia and a mutual commitment to making the world safe for autocracy. See citation[4].
26.4 Building a Sanctions-Proof World
Finally, the declaration was a blueprint for a post-Western global economy. It included specific pledges to increase trade in local currencies, to build new cross-border financial infrastructure, and to integrate their payment systems to reduce their shared vulnerability to the U.S. dollar and the threat of Western sanctions. It was a formal declaration of their intent to build a parallel economic and financial universe, an "axis of evasion," that would be immune to the West's primary tools of economic warfare.
Kremlin. "Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development." February 4, 2022. http://www.en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5770
Office of the Director of National Intelligence. "Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community." February 6, 2023. https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/2023-ATA-Unclassified-Report.pdf
Lemon, Edward. "Putin Has a Green Light From China, So Long as He Limits the Carnage." Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), February 9, 2022. https://www.csis.org/analysis/putin-has-green-light-china-so-long-he-limits-carnage
Lukin, Alexander. "What the West Gets Wrong About China and Russia." Foreign Affairs, July 26, 2022. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2022-07-26/what-west-gets-wrong-about-china-russia